Blog Post

How to Enable “Update Now” Button in Cpanel Awstats

How to Enable “Update Now” Button in Cpanel Awstats

Tired of bugging your host to update Cpanel awstats? You can generate stats, update it by your own by clicking the ‘update now’ link at the top of the main page in the awstats. You can place this “update now” by yourself .

Find out how to change the configuration file for Awstats to re-enable the ‘update now’ button.

Follow these steps:
1. login into cPanel
1a. Open File Manager
2. navigate to /home/username/tmp/awstats/
3. edit the .conf file (e.g. awstats.yourdomain.com.conf)
4. look for this line: AllowToUpdateStatsFromBrowser, set the value to 1 (AllowToUpdateStatsFromBrowser=1)
5. Save the .conf file. When you refresh your statistics page. you will get ‘update now’ link at the top of the page.

This applies for any subdomain as well.

How do sites get Fake Ranking in Google Page Rank?

Fake ranking the term getting popular these days. The new domains and the existing domains in the web doesn’t ranked by Google fast and easy. To get very fast rankings and to show the domain is ranked by Google, Fake Ranking is a SEO Black Hat. No SEO Professionals welcome Fake Ranking.

How to get Fake Ranking in Google?

Redirecting the website to a highly ranked website is the method used to get fake rankings. For example, if SOMESITE.com has PR 6, Some pages of the website SOMEFAKESITE.com of PR 0 will be redirected to SOMESITE.com. Google recognizes that SOMEFAKESITE.com has been redirected to SOMESITE.com and gives the recognition/ranking of SOMESITE.com. But it is mostly unstable and Google is still improving its methodology, this may cause your link banned from Google.

How to find Google Fake Ranked Sites?

If you suspect that a site is fake ranked you can test it.
Goto Google.com and type info:THESITEYOUSUSPECT.com

If Google returns with the information, then the site has been ranked in Google. if not then it is fake.

Google Adwords, Yahoo SM or Microsoft Adcenter Which is better and Which works better?

A Very Useful data for your PPC Campaign. Google Adwords, Yahoo Search Marketing or Microsoft Adcenter Which is better and Which works better?

Here are the different opinions of the various users. Opinion differs, Here is the opinion of various users about Google Adwords, Yahoo Search Marketing and Microsoft Adcenter

Traffic Volume
1) Google AdWords (#1 by leaps and bounds)
2) Yahoo Search Marketing
3) MSN adCenter

Quality of Click (Based on conversion data)
1) MSN adCenter
2) Google AdWords
3) Yahoo Search Marketing

Ease of Use
1) MSN adCenter
2) Yahoo Search Marketing
3) Google AdWords (They change all the time, and require constant care to manage accounts. Learning curve is very high for new users.)

Lowest Cost per Conversion (Lowest is better)
1) MSN
2) Google
3) Yahoo

Technical Support
1) MSN (The support staff getting better every day. At first they were had to look stuff up all the time)
2) Google
3) Yahoo

Has the Options for Your Needs
1) Google AdWords
2) Yahoo
3) MSN

versatile
1) AdWords
2) Yahoo
3) MSN

Overall
1) AdWords
2) MSN
3) Yahoo

Best Thing About Each Service
AdWords - Level of sophistication. Smartest and most relevant advertiser can win — not just the person with the biggest pocket book.
MSN - Very easy. Recommended for beginners.
Yahoo – If you don’t have a lot of time to manage accounts, you can pretty much place your bid and leave it alone if you got deep pockets. You’ll be able to get number one with bid price alone. Don’t have to worry too much about CTR so you can qualify your visitors more with adText.

Worst Thing About Each Service
AdWords – Unexpected changes to a ‘computer algorithm’ can change the game fast.
MSN – Interface not for those with large accounts.
Yahoo – Human reviews are often inconsistent. Their policy seems to be interpreted differently by each reviewer.


Traffic Volume
1) Google AdWords (#1 by leaps and bounds)
2) Yahoo Search Marketing
3) MSN adCenter

Quality of Click (Based on conversion data)
1) MSN adCenter
2) Google AdWords
3) Yahoo Search Marketing

Ease of Use
1) Yahoo
2) Google
3) MSN

Lowest Cost per Conversion (Lowest is better)
1) MSN
2) Yahoo/Google a tie

Technical Support
1) Yahoo
2) MSN/Google tie

Has the Options for Your Needs
1) Yahoo/Google tie
2) MSN

versatile
1) Yahoo
2) Google
3) MSN

Overall
1) MSN
2) Yahoo/Google tie

I’ll put in my 2 cents, no make that $10.00.

Traffic Volume
1) Google
2) Yahoo
3) MSN

Quality of Click (Based on conversion data)
1) MSN
2) Yahoo
3) Google

Ease of Use
1) Google
2) Yahoo
3) MSN

Lowest Cost per Conversion (Lowest is better)
1) MSN
2) Yahoo
3) Google (By a long shot)

Technical Support
1) Yahoo
2) MSN
3) Google (A definite no show in this category)

Has the Options for Your Needs
1) Google
2) Yahoo
3) MSN

versatile
1) Google
2) Yahoo
3) MSN

To summarize:

1) Google has the trafic
2) Yahoo has the conversions
3) MSN has the customer support

Give me MSN/Yahoo platter over Googles Drive By Users

This is a good topic, but are you kidding about the Ease of Use for MSN? It’s horrible, very difficult to use.

My Answers (pretty similar to OP’s):

Traffic Volume
1) Google AdWords
2) Yahoo Search Marketing
3) MSN adCenter

Quality of Click (Based on conversion data)
1) MSN adCenter
2) Google AdWords
3) Yahoo Search Marketing

Ease of Use
1) Google AdWords
2) Yahoo Search Marketing
3) MSN adCenter

Lowest Cost per Conversion (Lowest is better)
1) MSN
2) Google
3) Yahoo

Technical Support
1) Google
2) Yahoo
3) MSN

Has the Options for Your Needs
1) Google AdWords
2) Yahoo
3) MSN

versatile
1) AdWords
2) Yahoo
3) MSN

Overall
1) MSN
2) AdWords
3) Yahoo

Best Thing About Each Service
AdWords - Versatile. Many options. Good reports. Easy to use.
MSN - No affiliates! Therefore, lowest cost per action.
Yahoo – Gets you valuable yahoo.com traffic.

Worst Thing About Each Service
AdWords – Some bad affiliates, although they look good compared to Yahoo.
MSN – Bad interface. Hard to manage and control.
Yahoo – Huge number of low quality affiliates and getting worse all the time. Yahoo.com makes up only 20% of clicks. Many too many parked domains make up about half of clicks. Also, can’t run more than one creative per word.

OK, here goes…Rafi

Traffic Volume
1) Google AdWords
2) Yahoo Search Marketing
3) MSN adCenter

Quality of Click (Based on conversion data)
1) MSN adCenter
2) Google
3) Yahoo
(but all fairly close)

Ease of Use
1) Google
2) Yahoo Search Marketing
3) MSN

Lowest Cost per Conversion (Lowest is better)
1) MSN
2) Yahoo
3) Google (due to highest prices)

Technical Support
1) MSN
2) Yahoo
3) Google (more people please, less automated emails)

Has the Options for Your Needs
1) Google AdWords
2) MSN
3) Yahoo

versatile
1) MSN
2) Google
3) Yahoo

Overall
1) MSN
2) Yahoo
3) Google

I put google at the bottom for overall, due to factors not weighed in on here… such as reliability, stability, and consistancy. Plus, click fraud… Google scores lowest for that one too.

God bless PPC.

Traffic Volume
1) Google AdWords
2) Yahoo Search Marketing
3) MSN adCenter

Quality of Click (Based on conversion data)
1) MSN adCenter
2) Google AdWords
3) Yahoo Search Marketing

Ease of Use
1) Google
2) MSN
3) Yahoo

Lowest Cost per Conversion (Lowest is better)
1) MSN
2) Google
3) Yahoo

Technical Support
1) Yahoo
2) MSN
3) Google

Has the Options for Your Needs
1) Google
2) MSN
3) Yahoo

versatile
1) Google
2) MSN
3) Yahoo

Overall
1) Google
2) MSN
3) Yahoo

I used to be pro-Google all the way, until QS happened, now they’re at the bottom of the pile…

Traffic Volume
1) MSN adCenter
2) Yahoo Search Marketing
3) Google (until July 12, hands down #1)

Quality of Click (Based on conversion data)
1) MSN adCenter
2) Google (used to be #1 but now they don’t want my money…even so, still better than Yahoo)
3) Yahoo

Ease of Use
1) Google
2,3 tie) Yahoo Search Marketing & MSN

Lowest Cost per Conversion (Lowest is better)
1) MSN
2) Google
3) Yahoo

Technical Support
1) MSN
2) Yahoo
3) Google

Has the Options for Your Needs
1) Google AdWords
2) MSN
3) Yahoo

Versatile
1) Google
2) MSN
3) Yahoo

Overall
1) MSN
2) Yahoo
3) Google (would be #1, but now I’m bitter)

Best Thing About Each Service
AdWords - Exceptional interface and tools. Easy to get new campaigns running. High CTRs and conversions before clicks became $10.

MSN - LOVE the low prices and conversion is good. Also, seems like a low occurence of fake clicks. Wish they had more traffic, or I’d skip Yahoo altogether. Lastly, they actually called me about a customer service problem and fixed it quick.

Yahoo – Love the no-guessing about where I’ll rank in the listings. They too called to rectify a customer service thing and also fixed it quick.

Worst Thing About Each Service
AdWords – They decided to eschew my sites despite great CTRs and conversions. I’m soooo mad about this, can you tell?

MSN – Slowest interface around and logs you out too quickly.

Yahoo – Their clicks are overpriced and often from bogus sources. Hate that there’s no geo-targeting so many wasted clicks due to that alone. Also, their review process can be terrible, but at least they’re generous with refunds when they screw up.

Traffic Volume
1) Google AdWords
2) Yahoo Search Marketing
3) MSN adCenter

Quality of Click (Based on conversion data)
1) MSN adCenter
2) Google AdWords
3) Yahoo Search Marketing

Ease of Use
1) Yahoo
2) Google
3) MSN

Lowest Cost per Conversion (Lowest is better)
1) MSN
2) Google
3) Yahoo

Technical Support
1) Yahoo
2) MSN
3) Google

Has the Options for Your Needs
1) Google
2) MSN
3) Yahoo

versatile
1) Google
2) MSN
3) Yahoo

Overall
1) Google
2) Yahoo
3) MSN

The MSN interface is just too buggy, but it’s getting better everyday. I think they’re going to give Google and Yahoo a run for their money. Once they get a better volume of traffic (and the key here is good traffic) they’ll really be a viable option.

I think with Panama, Yahoo will really step back into the game, now if they can just get rid of some of their crummy partners, we’ll all be happy.

This useful peice of information was found on Webmasterworld forums.

Goto: Google Adwords

Goto: Yahoo Search Marketing

Goto: Microsoft Adcenter

Next Page »